•  
  •  
 

ORCID

https//orcid.org/0009-0005-5322-6710

Abstract

Satellite-based precipitation datasets have emerged as promising tools for addressing rainfall data scarcity in regions with limited ground observations, such as Sub-Saharan Africa. This study evaluates the performance of five satellite-based precipitation products CHIRPS, CPC, GPCC, MERRA-2, and ERA5 in capturing rainfall characteristics over the Little Ruaha Catchment in Tanzania. The assessment was carried out at daily, monthly, and seasonal timescales and focused on key rainfall indices including onset and cessation dates, length of the rainy season, total rainfall, and frequency of rainy days. Validation was conducted using statistical indicators such as the correlation coefficient (r), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Percent Bias (PBIAS). The results indicate that CHIRPS and CPC had strong agreement with observed rainfall at monthly and seasonal scales. CHIRPS, in particular, demonstrated consistent performance with r > 0.85 and NSE > 0.7 across most stations. At the daily scale, although all datasets performed poorly, CHIRPS still outperformed the others, showing moderate correlations around r ≈ 0.65. MERRA-2 and ERA5 showed higher errors and inconsistencies across different locations. The rainfall indices revealed that satellite datasets generally estimated earlier rainfall onset and delayed cessation compared to gauge data, resulting in longer estimated rainy seasons. For instance, CHIRPS overestimated the rainy season length by 31 days at Mafinga Bomani. In addition, satellite data often reported a higher frequency of rainy days, with discrepancies up to 16 days in some locations. These variations are attributed to the satellites' ability to detect light and scattered rainfall events missed by ground gauges. Overall, CHIRPS emerged as the most reliable product, offering a credible alternative for climate monitoring, hydrological modelling, and agricultural planning in data-scarce regions.

Publisher Name

University of Dar es Salaam

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.